To the uninitiated (ikke-indviede), little was remarkable about the decision by the World Bank earlier this spring to help finance the construction of a hydroelectric dam on a tributary (gren) of the Mekong River in Laos. It was just another series of grants and loan guarantees for just another international development project, writes The New York Times, according to the World Bank press review.
But to Bank watchers, environmentalists and multinational construction firms, the announcement of 270 million US dollar in grants and guarantees for the Nam Theun 2 dam was a landmark event. It represented the banks return to big dam projects, a field in which it made its mark beginning in the 1950s with monuments in concrete like the Kariba Dam on the Zambezi in southern Africa (mellem Zambia og Zimbabwe).
In recent years, however, the Bank had scaled back its involvement in dam building, in part because of regional economic problems and in part because of mounting criticism that many large dams did more harm than good. But now as it re-enters the arena, and with a new President, Paul D. Wolfowitz, starting his job just last week, the World Bank is finding that in some ways the game has changed.
The Bank has been under pressure to improve its review process to produce better dams: ones that generate as much power or irrigate as much land as developers claim, have as benign an impact on the environment as possible, and increase living standards of the people affected.
Yet such ”good” dams often have higher costs, so while the Bank moves cautiously, it risks losing projects to countries like China and India, which are willing to export their dam-building expertise without all the strings attached.
The Nam Theun 2 project has been in the planning stages for about a decade and a half. While the project will now go ahead with World Bank financing, the Laotian government has made it clear that it does not need such headaches: for future projects it will look to a neighbor, probably Vietnam, for help.
John Briscoe, senior water adviser for the Bank in New Delhi, said that elaborate planning and preparation like that undertaken for Nam Theun 2 spur great resentment in developing countries, which see hypocrisy in societies that built huge, often destructive dams in their own countries but want poorer countries to adhere to environmental and social safeguards.
Because of the social and environmental problems caused by many dams – the Kariba, for instance, has restricted the growth of the Zambezi delta, sharply reducing fisheries in Mozambique – there has been a widespread belief, in the developed world at least, that a large dam should be a project of last resort.
And for those dams that get the go-ahead, a World Commission on Dams, established with the banks blessing, recommended in 2000 a far more public process for deciding environmental and social issues, like the resettlement of displaced people.
– In the past the Bank had been guilty of trying to pretend we could solve every problem and had every answer, said Peter Stephens, regional communications manager for the World Bank in Singapore. Now, he said, ”instead of trying to define the public debate and narrow it, we have tried to hear people’s concerns.”
In the case of Nam Theun 2, a project intended to provide Laos, one of the poorest countries in Asia, with a source of foreign exchange through the sale of electricity to Thailand, this more open process has pleased some experts.
– It is by far the best thought-out of any project I have ever heard of, said Lee M. Talbot, a professor of environmental science at George Mason University and a consultant who advised the Bank on Nam Theun 2. – I am not a lover of dams, but I feel very strongly that this dam probably will be the one that has the real possibility of being successful from an environmental and social point of view, added he.
But others are far from satisfied.
Anti-dam organizations say that despite the Banks claims, the decision-making process was not open, given that it was conducted in a closed Communist society. – When you are talking about some kind of participatory process, how do you have it in that kind of society? said Aviva Imhof, campaigns director for the International Rivers Network, an anti-dam group based in Berkeley, Calif.
International Rivers Network has other problems with the project, and with most dams. In particular, said Patrick McCully, the groups executive director, the people most directly affected by a dam, those displaced by a reservoir and others who live downstream, are seldom consulted.
For Thayer Scudder, an emeritus professor at the California Institute of Technology and a former member of the commission, Nam Theun 2 is one dam that should be built.
– If Laos is going to alleviate the poverty of its country, what option was there to this project? said Scudder, an expert on resettlement issues who consulted on the project for the bank. – I think there were not many other major options, he concluded.
Kilde: www.worldbank.org
