The UN is putting in place better management practices that address the shortcomings revealed in the latest interim report by an independent panel looking into allegations of wrongdoing in the Oil-for-Food programme for Iraq, Secretary-General Kofi Annans Chief of Staff said Tuesday.
Mark Malloch Brown stressed, in reference to the Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC) headed by former United States Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, that “the important bit of Volcker” is the “forward-looking bit of Volcker, which is: having disposed of any charges of criminality and corruption against the system and against the Secretary-General, but having pinpointed failings by others, how do we move forward to put in place the management reforms that address that.
– And I would argue, the kind of things we are doing on more open, high-quality selection of senior staff, the reform of procurement and audit, the strengthening of OIOS going forward – all of these issues are a very serious response to the issues raised and show that the Secretary-General takes this very seriously, he said.
Responding to several questions about the Secretary-Generals involvement in the awarding of a contract to a Swiss firm that previously employed his son, Mr. Malloch Brown said it was now no longer up to Mr. Annan to prove his innocence, but for his accusers to prove his guilt.
– I think that the onus is now on those of you who wish to continue to pursue this; the burden of proof has shifted, he said.
– You do not get much clearer than no evidence, he added, referring to allegations that Mr. Annan improperly influenced the awarding of a contract to Cotecna to monitor the now defunct multibillion dollar programme that allowed the sanctions-bound Iraqi regime to sell oil in exchange for humanitarian supplies from 1996-2003.
– Let us first agree that the story has probably moved decisively on today from a probably, a final slaying of the ghosts that there was corruption in this by the Secretary-General to a second issue which is, “Was the management [of the programme] effective enough?” he said at another point.
– On that, Mr. Annan is the first to acknowledge it evidently was not. A number of individuals have now been cited in ways that are enormously damaging to the organization, he added.
Asked about the shredding (makulering) of some documents that dated from the time when the contract with Cotecna was awarded, Mr. Malloch Brown said: – The point is surely: Volcker looked, he looked under every stone, he threw millions of dollars of investigation at this and concluded “No Story.”
But, the Chief of Staff added, it was “an issue we have to look very carefully into because it is clearly deeply damaging to any investigation to have documents destroyed, particularly after an instruction has gone out to preserve documents.
“But as the report says, there appears – and the report appears to side with this – [that] there is a very reasonable explanation for this,” he said, noting that the shredded documents were duplicates that were destroyed for reasons of space.
Asked about reports of meetings between Cotecna executives and Mr. Annan, he replied: – Whatever Cotecnas aspirations in terms of developing a relationship with the Secretary-General, it was a dud (fuser), they did not, and there was no influence over that contract.
Kilde: FNs nyhedstjeneste
