Analyse: Vil pres udefra gøre kinesisk bistand mere gennemskuelig?

Hedebølge i Californien. Verdens klimakrise har enorme sundhedsmæssige konsekvenser. Alligevel samtænkes Danmarks globale klima- og sundhedsindsats i alt for ringe grad, mener tre  debattører.


Foto: Kevin Carter/Getty Images
Forfatter billede

Vis kineserne respekt, og de vil være mere åbne for at lytte til andre, siger nogle – kinesisk bistand er en lukket bog og dirigeres af handelsministeriet i Beijing, hvilket siger alt, mener andre.

LONDON, 26 March 2012 (IRIN): Critics have long characterized China as a secretive donor in economically poor but resource-rich countries, funding infrastructure construction in an unspoken bid for business deals and access to natural wealth and land.

While China disburses (udbetaler) aid with a scant paper trail, analysts say strong-arming (søge at tvinge) its government to boost transparency – and aid efficacy (virkninger) – may hurt countries in need.

In Southeast Asia, Chinese-funded projects have become ubiquitous (allestedsnærværende) in Cambodia, Laos and Burma, countries once passed over by traditional donors.

In river-rich Laos, a government development plan calls for 55 new dams to generate hydroelectric power, many of them funded by Chinese state-owned companies.

Laotian media reported that China’s government recently signed five agreements pledging more than 30 million US dollar to build government offices.

Cambodia not worried about the World Bank

Cambodia’s Prime Minister, Hun Sen, inaugurated one of the largest Chinese construction projects in the country in December 2011, a dam in fertile Kampot Province in the southeast.

This project comes on top of 1,2 billion dollar the Chinese government pledged to Laos in 2010 – more than any other bilateral or multilateral donor.

Officials also welcomed Chinese aid in August 2011, when the World Bank suspended new loans to the country after finding that a Bank-financed land-titling project (skaffe skøder på jorden) failed to secure property rights for residents facing eviction.

Cambodian leaders – including the prime minister – have repeatedly stated they are not worried about losing World Bank loans (which currently total 131 million dollar) because they prefer “no strings” Chinese aid.

Large investor in Burma

Elsewhere in the region, local media have reported ongoing talks between the Burmese government and the China Power Investment Corporation to restart construction of the 3,6 billion dollar Myitsone Dam, which Burmese president Thein Sein suspended in September 2011 over concerns about transparency and environmental damage.

Despite the chronic tensions between China and Burma over drug trafficking, refugee outflows and ethnic conflicts along their shared border, the Chinese government is one of Burmas largest investors, according to Burmese government statistics.

In 2008 there already were some 90 Chinese-funded hydropower and extractive industry projects, according to a survey by the US-based EarthRights International NGO.

“China’s aid is focused on infrastructure, which is badly needed in developing countries,” said Wang Yong, director of the Centre for International Political Economy at Peking University in Beijing.

“By comparison, US aid is more driven by strategic and political objectives,” noted he.

Almost no information available

With almost no information available about China-funded projects in the public domain – including their potential environmental impact – EarthRights relied on company press releases and government statements.

Other NGOs in the region have complained that environmental impact assessments (undersøgelser af projekters miljøpåvirkninger) are often not open to local communities or there is too little time to comment.

Chinese aid is disbursed in line with its policy of staying out of other countries’ governance, as laid out in its April 2011 aid position paper.

“China might interfere in other ways, like currying favour and obtaining sweetheart deals for its companies…Their Ministry of Commerce determines the aid, which tells you just what is driving their considerations,” said Sophal Ear, a California-based political economist specializing in aid and governance.

China’s estimated 3,18 trillion dollar in foreign exchange reserves can be “enormously” transformative for poor countries, Ear added.

Pressure pitfalls

Læs videre på
http://www.irinnews.org/Report/95158/AID-POLICY-Will-pressure-make-Chinese-aid-more-transparent